Instead, they fought (and are fighting) the justice system. It would be good to see those evidence tested at the National Court. Vaki's lawyer must argue the evidence contained in Sam Koim's affidavit is wrong.
For the sake of those who have forgotten here is what the lawyer would have to argue for and against:
1. O'Neill knew the letter containing his official signature existed since 24th of January 2012.
2. O'Neill signed the letter when he was F & T Minister under Somare.
3. O'Neill denied signing the letter when he is Prime Minister.
4. O'Neill LIED whilst in the PM's seat5. O'Neill confirmed he lied.
6. O'Neill gave directive to release K80 million to Paraka forthwith.
7. O'Neill and Paraka consciously collaborated in illegal and fraudulent payments.
8. Payments were made without consent from Department of Justice.
9. O'Neill did his mate a favour - he had a bank overdraft of over K8 million at the time of the letter
10. Forensic investigators CONFIRMED the signature on the letter was Peter O'Neill's.
Prove to courts that those were baseless allegation and the work of TFS is a sham. PM, Vaki & Pala and those laywers representing them have to prove to the contrary the evidence contained therein Sam Koim's Affidavit! Why isn't that happening?!
~~~~~~~